The First Way: Argument from Motion
The argument is valid.
Every inference was checked by machine.
flowchart TD
classDef axiom fill:#f6efd9,stroke:#a8842a,color:#23212b;
classDef premise fill:#e7edf7,stroke:#1f4e9c,color:#23212b;
classDef deduction fill:#f3f4f1,stroke:#5b6b85,color:#23212b;
classDef conclusion fill:#d6e1f3,stroke:#1f4e9c,stroke-width:3px,color:#23212b;
classDef objection fill:#f7e3e1,stroke:#b3261e,color:#23212b;
classDef reply fill:#f3f4f1,stroke:#7a5c2e,color:#23212b;
classDef imported stroke-dasharray:4 3;
classDef defeated fill:#f3f4f1,stroke:#b3261e,stroke-dasharray:6 3,color:#8a8796;
classDef undecided stroke-dasharray:2 2;
classDef overruled fill:#f3f4f1,stroke:#c9ccc6,color:#8a8796;
ST(["ST: Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, I,<br/>q.2, a.3"]):::axiom
Ps102(["Ps102: Psalms 102:25-27"]):::axiom
Heb1(["Heb1: Hebrews 1:3"]):::axiom
P1["<b>P1</b>: Some things in the world are in motion.<br/><i>∃x. Moved(x)</i>"]:::premise
P2["<b>P2</b>: Whatever is moved is moved by something<br/>other than itself.<br/><i>∀x. Moved(x) → (∃y. Moves(y, x) ∧ y ≠<br/>x)</i>"]:::premise
P3["<b>P3</b>: An infinite regress of movers is<br/>impossible.<br/><i>¬Regress</i>"]:::premise
P4["<b>P4</b>: If something is moved, every moved thing<br/>has another mover, and every mover is<br/>itself moved, then there is an infinite<br/>regress of movers.<br/><i>(∃x. Moved(x)) ∧ (∀x. Moved(x) → (∃y.<br/>Moves(y, x) ∧ y ≠ x)) ∧ (∀x. ∀y.<br/>Moved(x) ∧ Moves(y, x) → Moved(y)) →<br/>Regress</i>"]:::premise
P5["<b>P5</b>: A first mover, itself unmoved, is what<br/>everyone understands to be God.<br/><i>∀y. ¬Moved(y) ∧ (∃x. Moves(y, x)) →<br/>God(y)</i>"]:::premise
D1["<b>D1</b>: Therefore there is a first mover, moved<br/>by no other.<br/><i>∃y. ¬Moved(y) ∧ (∃x. Moves(y, x))</i>"]:::deduction
C1["<b>C1</b>: Therefore God exists.<br/><i>∃y. God(y)</i>"]:::conclusion
ST -.-> P1
ST -.-> P2
ST -.-> P3
ST -.-> P4
ST -.-> P5
Ps102 -.-> P5
Heb1 -.-> P5
P1 --> D1
P2 --> D1
P3 --> D1
P4 --> D1
D1 --> C1
P5 --> C1
Sources
- ST
- Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, I, q.2, a.3
- Ps102
- Psalms 102:25-27 (protestant canon)
- Heb1
- Hebrews 1:3 (protestant canon)
The argument
P1 premise
Some things in the world are in motion.
∃x. Moved(x)
Grounded by ST
P2 premise
Whatever is moved is moved by something other than itself.
∀x. Moved(x) → (∃y. Moves(y, x) ∧ y ≠ x)
Grounded by ST
P3 premise
An infinite regress of movers is impossible.
¬Regress
Grounded by ST
P4 premise
If something is moved, every moved thing has another mover, and every mover is itself moved, then there is an infinite regress of movers.
(∃x. Moved(x)) ∧ (∀x. Moved(x) → (∃y. Moves(y, x) ∧ y ≠ x)) ∧ (∀x. ∀y. Moved(x) ∧ Moves(y, x) → Moved(y)) → Regress
Grounded by ST
P5 premise
A first mover, itself unmoved, is what everyone understands to be God.
∀y. ¬Moved(y) ∧ (∃x. Moves(y, x)) → God(y)
Grounded by ST, Ps102, Heb1
D1 deduction
Therefore there is a first mover, moved by no other.
∃y. ¬Moved(y) ∧ (∃x. Moves(y, x))
From P1, P2, P3, P4
Proof
C1 conclusion
Therefore God exists.
∃y. God(y)
From D1, P5